Acumatica vs IFS Applications
Side-by-side comparison of Acumatica and IFS Applications — features, pricing, modules, and deployment options.
Acumatica vs IFS Applications at a Glance
| Criteria | Acumatica | IFS Applications |
|---|---|---|
| Best For | Midsize companies wanting unlimited users and flexible cloud ERP | Asset-intensive industries needing ERP, EAM, and field service in one platform |
| Starting Price | Custom quote | $110/user/mo |
| Pricing Model | resource-based | per-user |
| Deployment | cloud, on-premise, hybrid | cloud, on-premise, hybrid |
| Company Size | 51-250, 251-1000 | 251-1000, 1001-5000, 5000+ |
| Implementation | 4–8 months | 6–14 months |
| Typical Cost | $75K–$350K | $200K–$1M+ |
Module Comparison
| Module | Acumatica | IFS Applications |
|---|---|---|
| Finance & Accounting | ★★★ Strong | ★★★ Strong |
| Manufacturing | ★★★ Strong | ★★★ Strong |
| Supply Chain | ★★ Moderate | ★★★ Strong |
| CRM | ★★★ Strong | ★★ Moderate |
| HR & Payroll | ★ Basic | ★★ Moderate |
| Project Management | ★★★ Strong | ★★★ Strong |
| Inventory Management | ★★★ Strong | ★★★ Strong |
| Procurement | ★★ Moderate | ★★★ Strong |
| Warehouse Management | ★★★ Strong | ★★ Moderate |
| Ecommerce | ★★★ Strong | — N/A |
| Business Intelligence | ★★ Moderate | ★★ Moderate |
| Quality Management | ★ Basic | ★★★ Strong |
| Field Service | ★★★ Strong | ★★★ Strong |
| Asset Management | ★★ Moderate | ★★★ Strong |
Pros & Cons
Acumatica
Pros
- +Unlimited users — resource-based pricing is unique and cost-effective
- +Open API and strong integration marketplace
- +Excellent construction and distribution editions
- +Modern, responsive UI with mobile-first design
Cons
- -Smaller partner network than SAP, Oracle, or Microsoft
- -HR/payroll is very basic — needs third-party integration
- -Less suited for 5,000+ employee enterprises
- -Business intelligence not as deep as Power BI or SAP Analytics
IFS Applications
Pros
- +Best-in-class field service management (FSM)
- +Integrated enterprise asset management (EAM)
- +Excellent for project-based and engineer-to-order manufacturing
- +Strong MRO (maintenance, repair, overhaul) capabilities
Cons
- -No ecommerce module
- -Smaller partner ecosystem than SAP/Oracle/Microsoft
- -Less known in North America (strong in Europe)
- -Reporting/BI relies on third-party tools
When to Choose Acumatica
- You need an ERP best suited for midsize companies wanting unlimited users and flexible cloud erp
- Your company has 51-250 or 251-1000 employees
- You operate in Construction, Wholesale & Distribution, Manufacturing
- You prefer cloud / on-premise / hybrid deployment
When to Choose IFS Applications
- You need an ERP best suited for asset-intensive industries needing erp, eam, and field service in one platform
- Your company has 251-1000 or 1001-5000 or 5000+ employees
- You operate in Aerospace & Defense, Construction, Oil & Gas
- You prefer cloud / on-premise / hybrid deployment
- Your budget aligns with $110/user/mo starting price
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Acumatica better than IFS Applications?
It depends on your business needs. Acumatica is best for midsize companies wanting unlimited users and flexible cloud erp, while IFS Applications is best for asset-intensive industries needing erp, eam, and field service in one platform. Acumatica starts at custom pricing and IFS Applications starts at $110/user/mo.
How does Acumatica pricing compare to IFS Applications?
Acumatica uses a resource-based pricing model, while IFS Applications uses a per-user model starting at $110/user/mo. Acumatica typical total cost is $75K–$350K vs $200K–$1M+ for IFS Applications.
Which is better for construction: Acumatica or IFS Applications?
Both vendors serve construction companies. Acumatica is typically chosen by 51-250, 251-1000 employee organizations, while IFS Applications targets 251-1000, 1001-5000, 5000+ employee companies. Consider your company size and specific module needs to decide.
Need a personalized recommendation?
Tell us about your business and we'll help you shortlist the best ERP systems for your needs.