IFS Applications vs Sage Intacct
Side-by-side comparison of IFS Applications and Sage Intacct — features, pricing, modules, and deployment options.
IFS Applications vs Sage Intacct at a Glance
| Criteria | IFS Applications | Sage Intacct |
|---|---|---|
| Best For | Asset-intensive industries needing ERP, EAM, and field service in one platform | Service companies and nonprofits needing deep financial management |
| Starting Price | $110/user/mo | Custom quote |
| Pricing Model | per-user | custom |
| Deployment | cloud, on-premise, hybrid | cloud |
| Company Size | 251-1000, 1001-5000, 5000+ | 51-250, 251-1000 |
| Implementation | 6–14 months | 3–6 months |
| Typical Cost | $200K–$1M+ | $50K–$200K |
Module Comparison
| Module | IFS Applications | Sage Intacct |
|---|---|---|
| Finance & Accounting | ★★★ Strong | ★★★ Strong |
| Manufacturing | ★★★ Strong | — N/A |
| Supply Chain | ★★★ Strong | ★ Basic |
| CRM | ★★ Moderate | ★ Basic |
| HR & Payroll | ★★ Moderate | ★ Basic |
| Project Management | ★★★ Strong | ★★★ Strong |
| Inventory Management | ★★★ Strong | ★★ Moderate |
| Procurement | ★★★ Strong | ★★ Moderate |
| Warehouse Management | ★★ Moderate | — N/A |
| Ecommerce | — N/A | — N/A |
| Business Intelligence | ★★ Moderate | ★★★ Strong |
| Quality Management | ★★★ Strong | — N/A |
| Field Service | ★★★ Strong | — N/A |
| Asset Management | ★★★ Strong | ★★ Moderate |
Pros & Cons
IFS Applications
Pros
- +Best-in-class field service management (FSM)
- +Integrated enterprise asset management (EAM)
- +Excellent for project-based and engineer-to-order manufacturing
- +Strong MRO (maintenance, repair, overhaul) capabilities
Cons
- -No ecommerce module
- -Smaller partner ecosystem than SAP/Oracle/Microsoft
- -Less known in North America (strong in Europe)
- -Reporting/BI relies on third-party tools
Sage Intacct
Pros
- +Best-in-class multi-dimensional financial reporting
- +AICPA preferred solution for accounting firms
- +Excellent multi-entity and fund accounting
- +Open API with 200+ Sage Intacct Marketplace integrations
Cons
- -No manufacturing, warehouse, or field service capabilities
- -Not a full-suite ERP — finance-first with gaps elsewhere
- -Pricing is opaque — requires a sales call
- -Customisation options are more limited than on-prem ERPs
When to Choose IFS Applications
- You need an ERP best suited for asset-intensive industries needing erp, eam, and field service in one platform
- Your company has 251-1000 or 1001-5000 or 5000+ employees
- You operate in Aerospace & Defense, Construction, Oil & Gas
- You prefer cloud / on-premise / hybrid deployment
- Your budget aligns with $110/user/mo starting price
When to Choose Sage Intacct
- You need an ERP best suited for service companies and nonprofits needing deep financial management
- Your company has 51-250 or 251-1000 employees
- You operate in Professional Services, Nonprofits, Software / SaaS
- You prefer cloud deployment
Frequently Asked Questions
Is IFS Applications better than Sage Intacct?
It depends on your business needs. IFS Applications is best for asset-intensive industries needing erp, eam, and field service in one platform, while Sage Intacct is best for service companies and nonprofits needing deep financial management. IFS Applications starts at $110/user/mo and Sage Intacct starts at custom pricing.
How does IFS Applications pricing compare to Sage Intacct?
IFS Applications uses a per-user pricing model starting at $110/user/mo, while Sage Intacct uses a custom model. IFS Applications typical total cost is $200K–$1M+ vs $50K–$200K for Sage Intacct.
Which is better for aerospace & defense: IFS Applications or Sage Intacct?
Both vendors serve aerospace & defense companies. IFS Applications is typically chosen by 251-1000, 1001-5000, 5000+ employee organizations, while Sage Intacct targets 51-250, 251-1000 employee companies. Consider your company size and specific module needs to decide.
Need a personalized recommendation?
Tell us about your business and we'll help you shortlist the best ERP systems for your needs.