Acumatica vs QAD Adaptive ERP
Side-by-side comparison of Acumatica and QAD Adaptive ERP — features, pricing, modules, and deployment options.
Acumatica vs QAD Adaptive ERP at a Glance
| Criteria | Acumatica | QAD Adaptive ERP |
|---|---|---|
| Best For | Midsize companies wanting unlimited users and flexible cloud ERP | Automotive, life sciences, and CPG manufacturers |
| Starting Price | Custom quote | $90/user/mo |
| Pricing Model | resource-based | per-user |
| Deployment | cloud, on-premise, hybrid | cloud |
| Company Size | 51-250, 251-1000 | 251-1000, 1001-5000, 5000+ |
| Implementation | 4–8 months | 5–10 months |
| Typical Cost | $75K–$350K | $150K–$600K |
Module Comparison
| Module | Acumatica | QAD Adaptive ERP |
|---|---|---|
| Finance & Accounting | ★★★ Strong | ★★ Moderate |
| Manufacturing | ★★★ Strong | ★★★ Strong |
| Supply Chain | ★★ Moderate | ★★★ Strong |
| CRM | ★★★ Strong | ★ Basic |
| HR & Payroll | ★ Basic | ★ Basic |
| Project Management | ★★★ Strong | ★ Basic |
| Inventory Management | ★★★ Strong | ★★★ Strong |
| Procurement | ★★ Moderate | ★★★ Strong |
| Warehouse Management | ★★★ Strong | ★★★ Strong |
| Ecommerce | ★★★ Strong | — N/A |
| Business Intelligence | ★★ Moderate | ★★ Moderate |
| Quality Management | ★ Basic | ★★★ Strong |
| Field Service | ★★★ Strong | — N/A |
| Asset Management | ★★ Moderate | ★★ Moderate |
Pros & Cons
Acumatica
Pros
- +Unlimited users — resource-based pricing is unique and cost-effective
- +Open API and strong integration marketplace
- +Excellent construction and distribution editions
- +Modern, responsive UI with mobile-first design
Cons
- -Smaller partner network than SAP, Oracle, or Microsoft
- -HR/payroll is very basic — needs third-party integration
- -Less suited for 5,000+ employee enterprises
- -Business intelligence not as deep as Power BI or SAP Analytics
QAD Adaptive ERP
Pros
- +Deep automotive and life sciences industry templates
- +Built-in EDI and supply chain collaboration tools
- +Strong quality management with compliance traceability
- +Cloud-native on AWS with rapid provisioning
Cons
- -CRM and HR are basic — third-party needed
- -No ecommerce or field service modules
- -Smaller partner ecosystem than Tier 1 vendors
- -Less flexibility for non-manufacturing use cases
When to Choose Acumatica
- You need an ERP best suited for midsize companies wanting unlimited users and flexible cloud erp
- Your company has 51-250 or 251-1000 employees
- You operate in Construction, Wholesale & Distribution, Manufacturing
- You prefer cloud / on-premise / hybrid deployment
When to Choose QAD Adaptive ERP
- You need an ERP best suited for automotive, life sciences, and cpg manufacturers
- Your company has 251-1000 or 1001-5000 or 5000+ employees
- You operate in Automotive, Pharmaceuticals, Food & Beverage
- You prefer cloud deployment
- Your budget aligns with $90/user/mo starting price
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Acumatica better than QAD Adaptive ERP?
It depends on your business needs. Acumatica is best for midsize companies wanting unlimited users and flexible cloud erp, while QAD Adaptive ERP is best for automotive, life sciences, and cpg manufacturers. Acumatica starts at custom pricing and QAD Adaptive ERP starts at $90/user/mo.
How does Acumatica pricing compare to QAD Adaptive ERP?
Acumatica uses a resource-based pricing model, while QAD Adaptive ERP uses a per-user model starting at $90/user/mo. Acumatica typical total cost is $75K–$350K vs $150K–$600K for QAD Adaptive ERP.
Which is better for manufacturing: Acumatica or QAD Adaptive ERP?
Both vendors serve manufacturing companies. Acumatica is typically chosen by 51-250, 251-1000 employee organizations, while QAD Adaptive ERP targets 251-1000, 1001-5000, 5000+ employee companies. Consider your company size and specific module needs to decide.
Need a personalized recommendation?
Tell us about your business and we'll help you shortlist the best ERP systems for your needs.