Kong vs Red Hat 3scale API Management
API management head-to-head for ERP teams: evidenced capabilities, published pricing, and which ERPs each actually integrates with.
| Starting price | From $500/user/mo (published) | Quote-based (Red Hat subscription) |
| Deployment | Cloud, On-premise, Hybrid | Cloud, On-premise, Hybrid |
| Company size | SMB, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Stated ERP integrations | None listed | None listed |
| Vendor | Kong Inc. | Red Hat |
Our take
Where Kong leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 18 of the 20 capabilities where they differ (led by multi-protocol support and rate limiting & quota enforcement).
- Published pricing where the alternative quotes.
Where Red Hat 3scale API Management leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 2 of the 20 capabilities where they differ (led by app registration & subscriptions and self-service developer portal).
Where they differ
The 20 capabilities (of 47 in the API management taxonomy) where the evidence separates them, biggest gaps first. “Not evidenced” means our research found no public documentation of this capability — the vendor may still offer it. Confirm on a demo.
| Capability | ||
|---|---|---|
| Multi-protocol supportAPI Gateway & Traffic Management | Core strength REST, gRPC, GraphQL, WebSocket, UDP, SOAP and Kafka traffic | Not evidenced |
| Rate limiting & quota enforcementAPI Gateway & Traffic Management | Core strength Rate limiting plus rate limiting advanced with sliding-window controls | Not evidenced |
| Load balancingAPI Gateway & Traffic Management | Core strength Routing, load balancing and reverse proxying | Not evidenced |
| Mutual TLS authenticationSecurity & Access Control | Core strength Mutual TLS authentication for routes and services | Not evidenced |
| Secrets manager / vault integrationSecurity & Access Control | Core strength Vault and cloud secrets-manager integration for credential storage | Not evidenced |
| Multi-provider LLM traffic routingAI & MCP Gateway | Core strength Multi-provider LLM routing across OpenAI, Azure, Bedrock, Gemini, Cohere and Anthropic | Not evidenced |
| AI token quotas & cost attributionAI & MCP Gateway | Core strength Token budgeting for AI/LLM requests | Not evidenced |
| Semantic caching for AI requestsAI & MCP Gateway | Core strength Semantic caching for AI/LLM requests | Not evidenced |
| OAuth2 / OpenID Connect supportSecurity & Access Control | Core strength OAuth2 (Community); OpenID Connect and SAML 2.0 (Enterprise) | Partial Multiple encryption, authentication and authorization protocols supported generically; not itemized by name |
| Custom / serverless authorizersSecurity & Access Control | Supported Custom plugins via Kong Plugin Development Kit | Not evidenced |
| Role-based access controlSecurity & Access Control | Core strength Role-based access control (RBAC) | Partial Access management for API consumers; explicit RBAC model not detailed |
| App registration & subscriptionsDeveloper Portal & Publishing | Not evidenced | Supported Access management for API consumers plus developer workflow tooling |
| Federated gateway managementDeployment & Architecture | Supported Unified management across multiple runtime and gateway groups | Not evidenced |
| Centralized API governanceGovernance & Monetization | Supported Unified management across multiple runtime and gateway groups | Not evidenced |
| Legacy protocol support (SOAP/EDI)ERP & Enterprise Connectivity | Supported SOAP traffic support | Not evidenced |
| Self-service developer portalDeveloper Portal & Publishing | Supported Developer portal and API service catalog (Konnect) | Core strength Developer portal for API discovery and onboarding |
| Spec-first design (OpenAPI)API Lifecycle & Design | Partial Kong Insomnia (sold separately) covers API design; not part of core Gateway/Konnect feature set | Not evidenced |
| Fully managed SaaS deploymentDeployment & Architecture | Core strength Fully managed Konnect deployment | Supported Cloud-hosted (SaaS) deployment |
| Usage-based billing / monetizationGovernance & Monetization | Core strength API analytics and usage-based billing (Konnect) | Supported Monetization listed among core program-management capabilities |
| Chargeback / cost attributionGovernance & Monetization | Partial Token budgeting scoped to AI/LLM traffic; general API chargeback not detailed | Not evidenced |
Both grade identically on the other 27 capabilities — see each product's full profile: Kong, Red Hat 3scale API Management.
Kong vs Red Hat 3scale API Management — FAQs
Is Kong or Red Hat 3scale API Management better for ERP integration?
They state different ERP coverage: Kong lists no ERP integrations publicly; Red Hat 3scale API Management lists no ERP integrations publicly.
Which is cheaper, Kong or Red Hat 3scale API Management?
Kong publishes a starting rate ($500/user/mo); Red Hat 3scale API Management prices by quote, so a like-for-like number requires asking both.
Get pricing for both
Tell us your ERP, seat count and must-haves and we'll come back with an independent view of what Kong and Red Hat 3scale API Management should each cost you — and whether a third option belongs on your shortlist.
Related comparisons
Amazon API Gateway vsAmazon API Gateway vs