Greenly vs Sweep
ESG & sustainability head-to-head for ERP teams: evidenced capabilities, published pricing, and which ERPs each actually integrates with.
| Starting price | Quote-based | Annual subscription, quote-based |
| Deployment | — | Cloud |
| Company size | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Stated ERP integrations | SAP, Sage Intacct | None listed |
| Vendor | Greenly | Sweep |
Our take
Where Greenly leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 12 of the 30 capabilities where they differ (led by activity-based and spend-based calculation and life cycle assessment (lca)).
- Stated SAP, Sage Intacct integration the alternative doesn't list.
Where Sweep leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 18 of the 30 capabilities where they differ (led by financed / portfolio emissions and self-serve supplier portal).
Where they differ
The 30 capabilities (of 59 in the ESG & sustainability taxonomy) where the evidence separates them, biggest gaps first. “Not evidenced” means our research found no public documentation of this capability — the vendor may still offer it. Confirm on a demo.
| Capability | ||
|---|---|---|
| Activity-based and spend-based calculationCarbon & GHG Accounting | Core strength | Not evidenced |
| Financed / portfolio emissionsCarbon & GHG Accounting | Not evidenced | Core strength Financed-emissions footprints |
| Life cycle assessment (LCA)Product Carbon Footprint & LCA | Core strength ISO-aligned LCA for individual products | Not evidenced |
| Self-serve supplier portalSupplier & Value Chain Engagement | Not evidenced | Core strength Free supplier accounts with individual dashboards |
| EUDR supplier screeningSupplier & Value Chain Engagement | Core strength Geolocation verification for EUDR | Not evidenced |
| CBAM import-emissions reportingSupplier & Value Chain Engagement | Core strength | Not evidenced |
| Double materiality assessmentRegulatory Disclosure & Reporting | Core strength | Not evidenced |
| GRI/SASB-aligned reportingRegulatory Disclosure & Reporting | Not evidenced | Core strength |
| CDP questionnaire supportRegulatory Disclosure & Reporting | Not evidenced | Core strength |
| US climate disclosure (SEC / SB 253 / SB 261)Regulatory Disclosure & Reporting | Not evidenced | Core strength California SB 253/SB 261 |
| EU Taxonomy alignment reportingRegulatory Disclosure & Reporting | Core strength | Not evidenced |
| XBRL/iXBRL disclosure taggingRegulatory Disclosure & Reporting | Core strength Automated xHTML/XBRL report generation | Not evidenced |
| Guided internal data-collection workflowsData Collection & Integration | Not evidenced | Core strength Automated reminders, approval workflows, audit trails |
| Automated data quality checksData Collection & Integration | Core strength | Not evidenced |
| Role-based access & approval workflowsPlatform & Enterprise Governance | Not evidenced | Core strength Democratizes insights across finance, procurement, ops |
| Peer / industry benchmarkingPlatform & Enterprise Governance | Core strength | Not evidenced |
| Custom report builderPlatform & Enterprise Governance | Not evidenced | Core strength Flexible dashboards and scenario modelling |
| Supplier ESG/emissions scorecardingSupplier & Value Chain Engagement | Partial EcoVadis benchmarking integration; no native scorecard shown | Core strength Benchmarking emissions, data quality, climate commitments |
| Collect-once, report-to-manyRegulatory Disclosure & Reporting | Not evidenced | Supported Pre-configured indicators, contextual compliance guidance |
| Marginal abatement cost (MAC) curveDecarbonization & Target Management | Partial Per-action ROI/CAPEX estimates, not an explicit MAC-curve ranking | Core strength MAC curve ranking of initiatives |
| AI anomaly detectionAI & Automation | Supported Automated consistency checks across emission data | Not evidenced |
| GHG Protocol-aligned methodologyCarbon & GHG Accounting | Supported GHG Protocol and Bilan Carbone methodology | Core strength |
| Calculation audit trailCarbon & GHG Accounting | Supported Digital audit trail with third-party auditor access | Core strength Immutable audit trails and version history |
| Product carbon footprint (PCF)Product Carbon Footprint & LCA | Supported Via ISO-aligned per-product LCA | Core strength Corporate, product-level and financed-emissions footprints |
| Pre-populated supplier emissions databaseSupplier & Value Chain Engagement | Core strength Matches against 200,000+ suppliers; AI-scraped disclosures | Supported Direct imports from CDP Supply Chain, EcoVadis, S&P, SBTi |
| TCFD/ISSB-aligned reportingRegulatory Disclosure & Reporting | Supported | Core strength |
| Assurance / audit-readiness supportRegulatory Disclosure & Reporting | Supported Digital audit trail with third-party auditor access | Core strength Limited and reasonable assurance readiness |
| CapEx/OpEx budget integrationDecarbonization & Target Management | Supported Automated ROI/CAPEX estimates per reduction action | Core strength Year-by-year CapEx/OpEx assessment |
| Automated data ingestionData Collection & Integration | Core strength AI-powered file parsing via EcoPilot | Supported Connectors to procurement systems, ERPs, invoice imports |
| API-based data integrationData Collection & Integration | Supported 100+ systems via API per vendor FAQ | Core strength Connectors plus API and invoice imports |
Both grade identically on the other 29 capabilities — see each product's full profile: Greenly, Sweep.
Greenly vs Sweep — FAQs
Is Greenly or Sweep better for ERP integration?
They state different ERP coverage: Greenly lists SAP, Sage Intacct; Sweep lists no ERP integrations publicly.
Which is cheaper, Greenly or Sweep?
Neither publishes a list price — both quote. Ask each for the all-in first-year cost at your seat count, as one number, and compare those.
Get pricing for both
Tell us your ERP, seat count and must-haves and we'll come back with an independent view of what Greenly and Sweep should each cost you — and whether a third option belongs on your shortlist.