AMTdirect vs IBM TRIRIGA
lease accounting head-to-head for ERP teams: evidenced capabilities, published pricing, and which ERPs each actually integrates with.
| Starting price | Quote-based | Quote-based |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud, On-premises, Hybrid |
| Company size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Stated ERP integrations | SAP, Oracle Fusion Cloud, Microsoft Dynamics 365, NetSuite | SAP, Oracle Fusion Cloud |
| Vendor | MRI Software | IBM |
Our take
Where AMTdirect leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 10 of the 15 capabilities where they differ (led by custom report builder and cam / operating expense reconciliation).
- Stated Microsoft Dynamics 365, NetSuite integration the alternative doesn't list.
Where IBM TRIRIGA leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 5 of the 15 capabilities where they differ (led by space & occupancy management and capital & construction project management).
Where they differ
The 15 capabilities (of 41 in the lease accounting taxonomy) where the evidence separates them, biggest gaps first. “Not evidenced” means our research found no public documentation of this capability — the vendor may still offer it. Confirm on a demo.
| Capability | ||
|---|---|---|
| Custom report builderReporting & Disclosures | Core strength 250+ configurable reports | Not evidenced |
| Space & occupancy managementReal Estate & Portfolio Management | Not evidenced | Core strength Dedicated Space Management module: room usage, occupancy, seating, moves/adds/changes |
| Capital & construction project managementReal Estate & Portfolio Management | Not evidenced | Core strength Dedicated Capital Project Management module |
| CAM / operating expense reconciliationReal Estate & Portfolio Management | Core strength Operating Expense Manager for CAM/opex reconciliation | Not evidenced |
| GASB 87 / public-sector complianceLease Accounting & Compliance | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Parallel multi-standard reportingLease Accounting & Compliance | Supported Dual entity/multi-book reporting | Not evidenced |
| Direct/automated posting to ERP GLJournal Entries & GL Integration | Supported API interface for ASC 842 journals and lease payments to ERP | Not evidenced |
| GL balance reconciliationJournal Entries & GL Integration | Not evidenced | Supported Automated lease payment reconciliation |
| Month-end close automationJournal Entries & GL Integration | Not evidenced | Supported Period-end close and disclosure reporting |
| Audit trail & version historyReporting & Disclosures | Supported | Not evidenced |
| AP/AR transaction handlingPayments & Financial Operations | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Open API for system connectivityPlatform, Access & Security | Supported | Not evidenced |
| ASC 842 (US GAAP) complianceLease Accounting & Compliance | Core strength | Supported |
| Multi-entity, multi-currency portfoliosLease Administration & Data | Partial Dual-entity/multi-book reporting; multi-currency not evidenced | Not evidenced |
| Journal entry export for manual importJournal Entries & GL Integration | Supported | Core strength Data Transfer Object (DTO) export for ERP GL posting |
Both grade identically on the other 26 capabilities — see each product's full profile: AMTdirect, IBM TRIRIGA.
AMTdirect vs IBM TRIRIGA — FAQs
Is AMTdirect or IBM TRIRIGA better for ERP integration?
Both state integrations with SAP, Oracle Fusion Cloud. AMTdirect additionally lists Microsoft Dynamics 365, NetSuite. Always verify the connector against your ERP version with a reference customer.
Which is cheaper, AMTdirect or IBM TRIRIGA?
Neither publishes a list price — both quote. Ask each for the all-in first-year cost at your seat count, as one number, and compare those.
Get pricing for both
Tell us your ERP, seat count and must-haves and we'll come back with an independent view of what AMTdirect and IBM TRIRIGA should each cost you — and whether a third option belongs on your shortlist.