Körber K.Motion Warehouse Management vs Manhattan Active Warehouse Management
warehouse management (WMS) head-to-head for ERP teams: evidenced capabilities, published pricing, and which ERPs each actually integrates with.
| Starting price | Quote-based | Enterprise cloud subscription, quote-based |
| Deployment | Cloud, On-premise | Cloud |
| Company size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Stated ERP integrations | SAP, Oracle Fusion Cloud, Microsoft Dynamics 365 | SAP, Oracle Fusion Cloud, Microsoft Dynamics 365 |
| Vendor | Infios (formerly Körber Supply Chain Software) | Manhattan Associates |
Our take
Where Körber K.Motion Warehouse Management leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 5 of the 17 capabilities where they differ (led by yard management and mobile rf / handheld device execution).
Where Manhattan Active Warehouse Management leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 12 of the 17 capabilities where they differ (led by multi-channel / omnichannel fulfillment and engineered labor standards).
Where they differ
The 17 capabilities (of 52 in the warehouse management (WMS) taxonomy) where the evidence separates them, biggest gaps first. “Not evidenced” means our research found no public documentation of this capability — the vendor may still offer it. Confirm on a demo.
| Capability | ||
|---|---|---|
| Multi-channel / omnichannel fulfillmentOrder Fulfillment & Picking | Not evidenced | Core strength |
| Engineered labor standardsLabor Management | Not evidenced | Core strength |
| Task interleavingLabor Management | Not evidenced | Core strength |
| Unified human and automation task managementAutomation & Robotics Orchestration | Not evidenced | Core strength |
| Yard managementYard & Dock Management | Core strength | Not evidenced |
| Mobile RF / handheld device executionPlatform, Mobility & Analytics | Core strength | Not evidenced |
| Configurable, process-driven workflow enginePlatform, Mobility & Analytics | Core strength | Not evidenced |
| Cloud-native architecture with elastic scalingPlatform, Mobility & Analytics | Not evidenced | Core strength |
| Multi-warehouse / multi-site supportInventory & Slotting | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Performance tracking and incentivesLabor Management | Not evidenced | Supported |
| Workforce planning and forecastingLabor Management | Not evidenced | Supported |
| Open API and extensibility toolingERP & Ecosystem Integration | Not evidenced | Supported |
| Advance shipment notice (ASN) processingReceiving & Putaway | Supported | Core strength |
| Real-time inventory visibilityInventory & Slotting | Supported | Core strength |
| Dynamic / AI-driven slotting optimizationInventory & Slotting | Supported | Core strength |
| Cycle countingInventory & Slotting | Core strength | Supported |
| Wave and waveless order releaseOrder Fulfillment & Picking | Supported | Core strength |
Both grade identically on the other 35 capabilities — see each product's full profile: Körber K.Motion Warehouse Management, Manhattan Active Warehouse Management.
Körber K.Motion Warehouse Management vs Manhattan Active Warehouse Management — FAQs
Is Körber K.Motion Warehouse Management or Manhattan Active Warehouse Management better for ERP integration?
Both state integrations with SAP, Oracle Fusion Cloud, Microsoft Dynamics 365. Always verify the connector against your ERP version with a reference customer.
Which is cheaper, Körber K.Motion Warehouse Management or Manhattan Active Warehouse Management?
Neither publishes a list price — both quote. Ask each for the all-in first-year cost at your seat count, as one number, and compare those.
Get pricing for both
Tell us your ERP, seat count and must-haves and we'll come back with an independent view of what Körber K.Motion Warehouse Management and Manhattan Active Warehouse Management should each cost you — and whether a third option belongs on your shortlist.