CheckAud vs MTC Skopos
access controls & SoD head-to-head for ERP teams: evidenced capabilities, published pricing, and which ERPs each actually integrates with.
| Starting price | Tiered: free assessment, fixed-fee proof of concept, quote-based license | Subscription (flat-rate annual license) |
| Deployment | — | On-premise |
| Company size | Mid-market, Enterprise | — |
| Stated ERP integrations | SAP | SAP, Oracle Fusion Cloud, Microsoft Dynamics 365 |
| Vendor | IBS Schreiber GmbH | Meylan Technologies and Consulting |
Our take
Where CheckAud leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 9 of the 19 capabilities where they differ (led by regulatory framework alignment and sap s/4hana migration readiness).
Where MTC Skopos leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 10 of the 19 capabilities where they differ (led by organizational-scope violation detection and what-if access simulation).
- Stated Oracle Fusion Cloud, Microsoft Dynamics 365 integration the alternative doesn't list.
Where they differ
The 19 capabilities (of 51 in the access controls & SoD taxonomy) where the evidence separates them, biggest gaps first. “Not evidenced” means our research found no public documentation of this capability — the vendor may still offer it. Confirm on a demo.
| Capability | ||
|---|---|---|
| Organizational-scope violation detectionAccess Risk & SoD Analysis | Not evidenced | Core strength Organizational-scope violation detection (company code, plant, profit center) |
| What-if access simulationSimulation, Testing & Remediation | Not evidenced | Core strength What-if simulation of role changes, user reassignments and org restructures |
| Regulatory framework alignmentReporting & Compliance | Core strength Reference rule sets covering DSAG, GDPR and SOX-relevant controls; IDW PS 880 alignment | Not evidenced |
| SAP S/4HANA migration readinessPlatform, AI & Deployment | Core strength SAP S/4HANA migration authorization validation and role-concept clean-up | Not evidenced |
| Conversational AI assistantPlatform, AI & Deployment | Not evidenced | Core strength Built-in AI assistant, plus MCP server compatibility for AI-tool integration |
| Prebuilt risk rule libraryAccess Risk & SoD Analysis | Supported Reference rule sets covering DSAG, GDPR and SOX-relevant controls, plus IBS Schreiber-supplied sets | Not evidenced |
| Custom rule authoringAccess Risk & SoD Analysis | Supported Support for custom risk rule sets | Not evidenced |
| Pre-approval conflict previewSimulation, Testing & Remediation | Not evidenced | Supported Preview of new conflicts introduced or resolved before go-live |
| Periodic access certification campaignsUser Access Review & Certification | Supported Continuous, recurring compliance-monitoring option available | Not evidenced |
| Continuous / real-time access reviewUser Access Review & Certification | Supported Continuous, recurring compliance-monitoring option | Not evidenced |
| Executive risk dashboardsReporting & Compliance | Supported Management-level risk dashboards with prioritized findings | Not evidenced |
| Historical audit trailReporting & Compliance | Not evidenced | Supported Change document analysis via CDHDR/CDPOS |
| AI-assisted risk analyticsPlatform, AI & Deployment | Not evidenced | Supported Built-in AI assistant for querying analysis results; optional local LLM for fully offline AI |
| BI tool exportPlatform, AI & Deployment | Not evidenced | Supported Power BI, Tableau and QlikSense-ready exports; JSON/CSV/Parquet output |
| API connectivityPlatform, AI & Deployment | Supported Interfaces for data export and system-to-system comparison | Not evidenced |
| Fine-grained entitlement discoveryCross-Application Identity Governance | Not evidenced | Supported Interactive user and role explorer |
| Impact-ranked remediation planningSimulation, Testing & Remediation | Supported Management-level risk dashboards with prioritized findings | Core strength Step-by-step, impact-ranked remediation planning |
| Audit-ready reportingReporting & Compliance | Core strength Audit-ready reports generated automatically; IDW PS 880-aligned audit methodology | Supported Audit-ready compliance and SoD documentation |
| Unused-access cost identificationLicensing & Cost Optimization | Partial "Can-Do" analysis surfaces excessive/unused permissions but no license-cost framing | Supported Over-privileged-user detection (granted vs. used access) |
Both grade identically on the other 32 capabilities — see each product's full profile: CheckAud, MTC Skopos.
CheckAud vs MTC Skopos — FAQs
Is CheckAud or MTC Skopos better for ERP integration?
Both state integrations with SAP. MTC Skopos additionally lists Oracle Fusion Cloud, Microsoft Dynamics 365. Always verify the connector against your ERP version with a reference customer.
Which is cheaper, CheckAud or MTC Skopos?
Neither publishes a list price — both quote. Ask each for the all-in first-year cost at your seat count, as one number, and compare those.
Get pricing for both
Tell us your ERP, seat count and must-haves and we'll come back with an independent view of what CheckAud and MTC Skopos should each cost you — and whether a third option belongs on your shortlist.