CheckAud vs Saviynt
access controls & SoD head-to-head for ERP teams: evidenced capabilities, published pricing, and which ERPs each actually integrates with.
| Starting price | Tiered: free assessment, fixed-fee proof of concept, quote-based license | From $25/user/mo (published) |
| Deployment | — | Cloud |
| Company size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Stated ERP integrations | SAP | SAP, Oracle Fusion Cloud, Workday |
| Vendor | IBS Schreiber GmbH | Saviynt |
Our take
Where CheckAud leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 8 of the 25 capabilities where they differ (led by usage-based risk prioritization and regulatory framework alignment).
Where Saviynt leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 17 of the 25 capabilities where they differ (led by ai-assisted risk analytics and cross-application sod policies).
- Published pricing where the alternative quotes.
- Stated Oracle Fusion Cloud, Workday integration the alternative doesn't list.
Where they differ
The 25 capabilities (of 51 in the access controls & SoD taxonomy) where the evidence separates them, biggest gaps first. “Not evidenced” means our research found no public documentation of this capability — the vendor may still offer it. Confirm on a demo.
| Capability | ||
|---|---|---|
| Usage-based risk prioritizationAccess Risk & SoD Analysis | Core strength "Did-Do" analysis of actual user activity from system logs, distinct from "Can-Do" excess-permission analysis | Not evidenced |
| Regulatory framework alignmentReporting & Compliance | Core strength Reference rule sets covering DSAG, GDPR and SOX-relevant controls; IDW PS 880 alignment | Not evidenced |
| SAP S/4HANA migration readinessPlatform, AI & Deployment | Core strength SAP S/4HANA migration authorization validation and role-concept clean-up | Not evidenced |
| AI-assisted risk analyticsPlatform, AI & Deployment | Not evidenced | Core strength AI-powered anomaly detection; predictive risk scoring |
| Non-invasive deploymentPlatform, AI & Deployment | Core strength Plug-and-play analysis of exported SAP data; no modification to the production system | Not evidenced |
| Cross-application SoD policiesCross-Application Identity Governance | Not evidenced | Core strength Cross-application governance and SoD across 100+ applications |
| Fine-grained entitlement discoveryCross-Application Identity Governance | Not evidenced | Core strength Fine-grained entitlement discovery and visualization; full-fidelity drill-down |
| Peer-based access recommendationsCross-Application Identity Governance | Not evidenced | Core strength Access request recommendations based on peer analytics |
| ML-based anomaly detectionCross-Application Identity Governance | Not evidenced | Core strength AI-powered anomaly detection |
| Pre-approval conflict previewSimulation, Testing & Remediation | Not evidenced | Supported Access request recommendations based on peer analytics |
| Impact-ranked remediation planningSimulation, Testing & Remediation | Supported Management-level risk dashboards with prioritized findings | Not evidenced |
| Firefighter / emergency access provisioningEmergency & Privileged Access | Not evidenced | Supported Emergency/temporary access provisioning |
| Time-boxed automatic revocationEmergency & Privileged Access | Not evidenced | Supported Automated access revocation workflows |
| Session monitoring and loggingEmergency & Privileged Access | Not evidenced | Supported Session monitoring during elevated access |
| Least-privilege role designRole Design & Identity Provisioning | Supported Role-concept clean-up ahead of migration | Not evidenced |
| License usage optimizationLicensing & Cost Optimization | Not evidenced | Supported License optimization tooling |
| API connectivityPlatform, AI & Deployment | Supported Interfaces for data export and system-to-system comparison | Not evidenced |
| Unified certification campaignsCross-Application Identity Governance | Not evidenced | Supported Automated access certification campaigns spanning connected applications |
| Critical / sensitive access detectionAccess Risk & SoD Analysis | Core strength Critical parameter and system-configuration checks; field-level checks across modules | Supported Violation prioritization by severity and application type |
| Risk scoring and prioritizationAccess Risk & SoD Analysis | Supported Risk-scored SoD findings | Core strength Predictive risk scoring for access requests |
| Prebuilt risk rule libraryAccess Risk & SoD Analysis | Supported Reference rule sets covering DSAG, GDPR and SOX-relevant controls, plus IBS Schreiber-supplied sets | Core strength Pre-built, app-specific SoD rulesets |
| Periodic access certification campaignsUser Access Review & Certification | Supported Continuous, recurring compliance-monitoring option available | Core strength Automated access certification campaigns |
| Continuous / real-time access reviewUser Access Review & Certification | Supported Continuous, recurring compliance-monitoring option | Core strength Continuous risk monitoring that flags outliers |
| Evidence documentation and exportReporting & Compliance | Supported | Core strength Audit evidence documentation |
| Unused-access cost identificationLicensing & Cost Optimization | Partial "Can-Do" analysis surfaces excessive/unused permissions but no license-cost framing | Supported Access-driven cost analysis |
Both grade identically on the other 26 capabilities — see each product's full profile: CheckAud, Saviynt.
CheckAud vs Saviynt — FAQs
Is CheckAud or Saviynt better for ERP integration?
Both state integrations with SAP. Saviynt additionally lists Oracle Fusion Cloud, Workday. Always verify the connector against your ERP version with a reference customer.
Which is cheaper, CheckAud or Saviynt?
Saviynt publishes a starting rate ($25/user/mo); CheckAud prices by quote, so a like-for-like number requires asking both.
Get pricing for both
Tell us your ERP, seat count and must-haves and we'll come back with an independent view of what CheckAud and Saviynt should each cost you — and whether a third option belongs on your shortlist.