Lattice vs Trakstar
performance & learning head-to-head for ERP teams: evidenced capabilities, published pricing, and which ERPs each actually integrates with.
| Starting price | From $4/user/mo (published) | Quote-based |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Company size | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Stated ERP integrations | Workday | None listed |
| Vendor | Lattice | Trakstar |
Our take
Where Lattice leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 29 of the 31 capabilities where they differ (led by 1:1 meeting management and calibration workflows).
- Published pricing where the alternative quotes.
- Stated Workday integration the alternative doesn't list.
Where Trakstar leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 2 of the 31 capabilities where they differ (led by configurable review templates and custom reporting dashboards).
Where they differ
The 31 capabilities (of 55 in the performance & learning taxonomy) where the evidence separates them, biggest gaps first. “Not evidenced” means our research found no public documentation of this capability — the vendor may still offer it. Confirm on a demo.
| Capability | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1:1 meeting managementPerformance Reviews & Feedback | Core strength 1:1 meeting agendas and history | Not evidenced |
| Calibration workflowsPerformance Reviews & Feedback | Core strength Conflict-of-interest avoidance for calibration groups | Not evidenced |
| Performance improvement plans (PIPs)Performance Reviews & Feedback | Core strength PIPs with tracked action items | Not evidenced |
| AI-assisted review writingPerformance Reviews & Feedback | Core strength | Not evidenced |
| Goal progress from connected work toolsGoals & OKRs | Core strength Jira and Salesforce data pulled into goal progress | Not evidenced |
| Goal analytics & trend reportingGoals & OKRs | Core strength | Not evidenced |
| 9-box performance/potential gridSuccession & Talent Intelligence | Core strength 9-box talent reviews | Not evidenced |
| Succession planning & readiness trackingSuccession & Talent Intelligence | Core strength Bench strength, readiness and attrition-risk fields | Not evidenced |
| Individual development plans (IDPs)Succession & Talent Intelligence | Core strength IDPs with short- and long-term goals (Grow) | Not evidenced |
| Compensation band building & sharingCompensation Management | Core strength | Not evidenced |
| Pay benchmarking against market dataCompensation Management | Core strength Powered by Mercer data | Not evidenced |
| Compensation review cycle managementCompensation Management | Core strength Org-wide compensation cycle management with budgets | Not evidenced |
| Pay equity & fairness analyticsCompensation Management | Core strength | Not evidenced |
| Performance-to-pay linkageCompensation Management | Core strength Pay-for-performance workflows linking ratings to merit | Not evidenced |
| Lifecycle surveysEmployee Engagement & Surveys | Core strength Onboarding and exit surveys | Not evidenced |
| AI sentiment analysis of open-textEmployee Engagement & Surveys | Core strength | Not evidenced |
| Manager action-planning toolsEmployee Engagement & Surveys | Core strength Theme-grouped suggested actions | Not evidenced |
| OKR creation and progress trackingGoals & OKRs | Core strength | Partial SMART goal framework; explicit OKR support not documented |
| Goal check-insGoals & OKRs | Supported Mid-cycle goal adjustment; weekly updates | Not evidenced |
| Pre-built survey template libraryEmployee Engagement & Surveys | Supported Custom survey builder | Not evidenced |
| AI-assisted manager coachingAI Content & Coaching | Supported AI-surfaced personalized development areas | Not evidenced |
| HRIS employee data syncPlatform & Integrations | Core strength Workday, ADP, BambooHR, UKG, Rippling prebuilt integrations | Partial Vendor states general HRIS integration; no specific connector names published |
| Collaboration app integrationPlatform & Integrations | Core strength Slack feedback, updates and review notifications | Partial Communication-app integration for reminders; specific apps not named |
| Continuous feedback & check-insPerformance Reviews & Feedback | Core strength Real-time peer and manager feedback (Habits) | Supported Notes and manager check-ins between formal reviews |
| Configurable review templatesPerformance Reviews & Feedback | Supported | Core strength |
| Goal cascading & alignmentGoals & OKRs | Core strength | Supported Goals aligned to organizational objectives |
| Internal mobility matchingSuccession & Talent Intelligence | Partial Promotion workflows documented; skills-based internal mobility matching not evidenced | Not evidenced |
| Pulse surveys & eNPSEmployee Engagement & Surveys | Core strength | Supported Workforce pulse surveys; eNPS not itemized separately |
| Engagement benchmarkingEmployee Engagement & Surveys | Core strength Against Mercer industry, regional and company-size data | Supported Benchmarking against peer groups |
| Custom reporting dashboardsReporting & Analytics | Supported Visual progress trackers and dashboards | Core strength Data visualization dashboards, customizable status reports |
| BI / data-warehouse exportReporting & Analytics | Partial Async CSV export with custom fields; dedicated BI-tool connector not documented | Not evidenced |
Both grade identically on the other 24 capabilities — see each product's full profile: Lattice, Trakstar.
Lattice vs Trakstar — FAQs
Is Lattice or Trakstar better for ERP integration?
They state different ERP coverage: Lattice lists Workday; Trakstar lists no ERP integrations publicly.
Which is cheaper, Lattice or Trakstar?
Lattice publishes a starting rate ($4/user/mo); Trakstar prices by quote, so a like-for-like number requires asking both.
Get pricing for both
Tell us your ERP, seat count and must-haves and we'll come back with an independent view of what Lattice and Trakstar should each cost you — and whether a third option belongs on your shortlist.