AutoRek vs Cadency
bank reconciliation head-to-head for ERP teams: evidenced capabilities, published pricing, and which ERPs each actually integrates with.
| Starting price | Quote-based | Quote-based |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Company size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Stated ERP integrations | None listed | SAP, Oracle Fusion Cloud, NetSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Workday |
| Vendor | AutoRek | Trintech |
Our take
Where AutoRek leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 17 of the 24 capabilities where they differ (led by credit card & pos/gateway reconciliation and crypto & digital-asset reconciliation).
Where Cadency leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 7 of the 24 capabilities where they differ (led by close task orchestration & checklists and audit-ready workpapers / ebinders).
- Stated SAP, Oracle Fusion Cloud, NetSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Workday integration the alternative doesn't list.
Where they differ
The 24 capabilities (of 50 in the bank reconciliation taxonomy) where the evidence separates them, biggest gaps first. “Not evidenced” means our research found no public documentation of this capability — the vendor may still offer it. Confirm on a demo.
| Capability | ||
|---|---|---|
| Credit card & POS/gateway reconciliationBank & Cash Reconciliation | Core strength Account, bank, credit card and POS/gateway reconciliations | Not evidenced |
| Crypto & digital-asset reconciliationBank & Cash Reconciliation | Core strength AutoRek MION: crypto-to-fiat and multi-blockchain matching to 18 decimal places | Not evidenced |
| Securities, positions & custody reconciliationBank & Cash Reconciliation | Core strength Securities, positions, and fixed-asset reconciliations | Not evidenced |
| Supplier statement reconciliationAP & Vendor Reconciliation | Core strength Balance sheet and supplier statement reconciliations | Not evidenced |
| Close task orchestration & checklistsFinancial Close & Journal Entries | Not evidenced | Core strength Close task orchestration dashboards, bottleneck identification, close calendar scheduling |
| Audit-ready workpapers / eBindersFinancial Close & Journal Entries | Not evidenced | Core strength Audit-ready eBinders |
| SOX control & task managementRegulatory Compliance & Controls | Not evidenced | Core strength SOX task management |
| Financial-services regulatory reportingRegulatory Compliance & Controls | Core strength MiFID II, EMIR, SFTR, CSDR, CASS, IFPR, IFRS 17, FCA safeguarding, RegToolKit | Not evidenced |
| Native or certified ERP connectorsPlatform & Integrations | Not evidenced | Core strength Certified prebuilt connectors into SAP, Oracle, NetSuite, Dynamics 365 and Workday |
| No-code / low-code configurationPlatform & Integrations | Core strength Business-user-modifiable rules engine; ARIA step-by-step configuration guidance | Not evidenced |
| Bank statement ingestion (SWIFT/BAI2/CAMT/ISO 20022)Bank & Cash Reconciliation | Supported APIs, SWIFT, ISO messages and file-based uploads | Not evidenced |
| Payment processor / PSP reconciliationBank & Cash Reconciliation | Supported Wallet balance and B2B payment reconciliations | Not evidenced |
| Root-cause analysis supportException Management | Supported ARIA anomaly analysis surfaces likely root causes | Not evidenced |
| Flux / variance analysisFinancial Close & Journal Entries | Supported Variance analysis; trending, forecasting and budget-vs-actual reporting | Not evidenced |
| Multi-entity / multi-subsidiary supportIntercompany & Multi-Entity | Not evidenced | Supported Standardized reconciliation templates and global policies across entities |
| Custom / ad-hoc report builderReporting & Analytics | Supported Configurable dashboards and reporting labels; output in any format | Not evidenced |
| Cash / payment forecastingReporting & Analytics | Supported Trending, forecasting and budget-vs-actual reporting | Not evidenced |
| Public / open REST APIPlatform & Integrations | Supported Connectivity via APIs | Not evidenced |
| SFTP / file-based ingestionPlatform & Integrations | Supported File-based uploads supported alongside APIs | Not evidenced |
| Journal entry creation, approval & postingFinancial Close & Journal Entries | Supported Automated journal postings | Core strength End-to-end journal entry workflow with configurable routing and approval controls |
| Intercompany balance reconciliation & eliminationIntercompany & Multi-Entity | Supported Intercompany processing | Core strength Intercompany transaction comparison and reconciliation |
| Segregation-of-duties access controlsRegulatory Compliance & Controls | Core strength Segregation-of-duties access controls | Supported Controlled internal and external auditor access |
| Full audit trail of actions & changesRegulatory Compliance & Controls | Core strength Comprehensive audit trails retained for every action | Supported Centralized compliance record keeping; control definition and mapping |
| Real-time management-information dashboardsReporting & Analytics | Core strength Real-time management-information dashboards | Supported Real-time reconciliation status and close status dashboards |
Both grade identically on the other 26 capabilities — see each product's full profile: AutoRek, Cadency.
AutoRek vs Cadency — FAQs
Is AutoRek or Cadency better for ERP integration?
They state different ERP coverage: AutoRek lists no ERP integrations publicly; Cadency lists SAP, Oracle Fusion Cloud, NetSuite, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Workday.
Which is cheaper, AutoRek or Cadency?
Neither publishes a list price — both quote. Ask each for the all-in first-year cost at your seat count, as one number, and compare those.
Get pricing for both
Tell us your ERP, seat count and must-haves and we'll come back with an independent view of what AutoRek and Cadency should each cost you — and whether a third option belongs on your shortlist.