Greenhouse vs Lever
talent acquisition head-to-head for ERP teams: evidenced capabilities, published pricing, and which ERPs each actually integrates with.
| Starting price | Annual subscription, quote-based by headcount and hiring volume | Annual subscription, quote-based by seats and headcount |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Company size | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Stated ERP integrations | Workday | Workday |
| Vendor | Greenhouse Software, Inc. | Lever (Employ, Inc.) |
Our take
Where Greenhouse leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 18 of the 27 capabilities where they differ (led by candidate rediscovery / silver medalists and resume parsing).
Where Lever leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 9 of the 27 capabilities where they differ (led by passive candidate sourcing tools and offer letter generation & e-signature).
Where they differ
The 27 capabilities (of 44 in the talent acquisition taxonomy) where the evidence separates them, biggest gaps first. “Not evidenced” means our research found no public documentation of this capability — the vendor may still offer it. Confirm on a demo.
| Capability | ||
|---|---|---|
| Passive candidate sourcing toolsSourcing & Job Distribution | Not evidenced | Core strength Chrome sourcing extension for pulling candidates from LinkedIn and other sites |
| Candidate rediscovery / silver medalistsCandidate CRM & Nurture | Core strength Resume parsing and candidate (re)discovery across the existing database | Not evidenced |
| Resume parsingAI Screening & Matching | Core strength | Not evidenced |
| Bias-reduction / anonymized screeningAI Screening & Matching | Core strength Resume/candidate anonymization; anti-bias nudges; anonymized take-home tests | Not evidenced |
| Candidate self-schedulingInterview Scheduling & Collaboration | Core strength | Not evidenced |
| Offer letter generation & e-signatureOffers, Screening & Compliance | Not evidenced | Core strength |
| Time-to-fill / time-to-hire reportingAnalytics & Reporting | Not evidenced | Core strength |
| Public API & developer platformPlatform & Integrations | Core strength 500+ pre-built integrations and an open REST API/developer platform; Greenhouse MCP server | Not evidenced |
| Multi job-board posting & syndicationSourcing & Job Distribution | Core strength Job distribution to 1,000+ job boards | Partial Career site and requisition posting; multi-board syndication scope not detailed |
| Internal mobility & rehire matchingSourcing & Job Distribution | Supported Internal job board | Not evidenced |
| AI candidate-to-job matching / rankingAI Screening & Matching | Not evidenced | Supported AI-generated candidate fit scores with stated justification |
| Candidate SMS / text messagingInterview Scheduling & Collaboration | Supported Powered by Grayscale | Not evidenced |
| Background check integrationOffers, Screening & Compliance | Not evidenced | Supported I-9 and background-check workflow integrations |
| New-hire data sync into HRIS/payrollOnboarding & HRIS Handoff | Core strength New-hire data sync from Greenhouse Recruiting into HRIS via HRIS Link | Partial Documented via a customer's custom-built Workday integration, not a standard product feature |
| I-9 / W-4 (or local equivalent) digital captureOnboarding & HRIS Handoff | Not evidenced | Supported I-9 workflow integrations |
| Role- & location-specific onboardingOnboarding & HRIS Handoff | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Source-of-hire / channel ROI reportingAnalytics & Reporting | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Single sign-on (SSO)Platform & Integrations | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Multi-language / localization supportPlatform & Integrations | Supported 19 languages for job boards; 6 for interviewing | Not evidenced |
| Branded career site builderSourcing & Job Distribution | Core strength No-code branded career pages and embeddable job widgets | Supported |
| Candidate skills assessments / testingAI Screening & Matching | Partial Anonymized take-home tests; no dedicated skills-testing library documented | Not evidenced |
| Hiring-team feedback collaborationInterview Scheduling & Collaboration | Supported | Core strength Hiring-manager and panel collaboration; consolidated candidate notes |
| EEO / OFCCP / DEI compliance reportingOffers, Screening & Compliance | Supported Funnel diversity metrics and pass-through-rate reporting | Core strength DEI and EEO compliance reporting, including bias-detection and pay-equity tracking |
| Offer approval workflowsOffers, Screening & Compliance | Supported Role-based permissions and approval workflows | Core strength |
| Onboarding task checklists & workflowsOnboarding & HRIS Handoff | Core strength Automated onboarding tasks with owner assignment and reminders; role/location/status-specific | Supported Onboarding automation add-on |
| Custom report builderAnalytics & Reporting | Core strength Custom report builder with boolean filtering; AI-built report filters | Supported Customizable executive dashboards with sharing/export |
| Prebuilt integration marketplacePlatform & Integrations | Core strength 500+ pre-built integrations | Supported |
Both grade identically on the other 17 capabilities — see each product's full profile: Greenhouse, Lever.
Greenhouse vs Lever — FAQs
Is Greenhouse or Lever better for ERP integration?
Both state integrations with Workday. Always verify the connector against your ERP version with a reference customer.
Which is cheaper, Greenhouse or Lever?
Neither publishes a list price — both quote. Ask each for the all-in first-year cost at your seat count, as one number, and compare those.
Get pricing for both
Tell us your ERP, seat count and must-haves and we'll come back with an independent view of what Greenhouse and Lever should each cost you — and whether a third option belongs on your shortlist.