Kyriba vs Tesorio
treasury & cash management head-to-head for ERP teams: evidenced capabilities, published pricing, and which ERPs each actually integrates with.
| Starting price | Quote-based | Annual subscription, quote-based |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Company size | Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Stated ERP integrations | NetSuite, SAP, Workday, Oracle Fusion Cloud, Microsoft Dynamics 365 | NetSuite, Sage Intacct, Workday, Microsoft Dynamics 365, SAP, Oracle Fusion Cloud |
| Vendor | Kyriba | Tesorio |
Our take
Where Kyriba leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 34 of the 39 capabilities where they differ (led by real-time cash positioning and liquidity planning).
Where Tesorio leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 5 of the 39 capabilities where they differ (led by automated ar collections & dunning and ai-assisted cash application).
- Stated Sage Intacct integration the alternative doesn't list.
Where they differ
The 39 capabilities (of 59 in the treasury & cash management taxonomy) where the evidence separates them, biggest gaps first. “Not evidenced” means our research found no public documentation of this capability — the vendor may still offer it. Confirm on a demo.
| Capability | ||
|---|---|---|
| Real-time cash positioningCash & Liquidity Management | Core strength Flagship cash visibility across 1,000+ connected banks | Not evidenced |
| Liquidity planningCash & Liquidity Management | Core strength | Not evidenced |
| SWIFT connectivityPayments & Bank Connectivity | Core strength | Not evidenced |
| Payment fraud detectionFraud Prevention & Compliance | Core strength | Not evidenced |
| FX exposure management & hedgingRisk & Financial Instruments | Core strength | Not evidenced |
| Hedge accountingRisk & Financial Instruments | Core strength | Not evidenced |
| Automated AR collections & dunningWorking Capital & Receivables | Not evidenced | Core strength |
| AI-assisted cash applicationWorking Capital & Receivables | Not evidenced | Core strength 95%+ automated payment-to-invoice match rate claimed |
| DSO tracking & analyticsWorking Capital & Receivables | Not evidenced | Core strength |
| Bank statement aggregationCash & Liquidity Management | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Cash pooling & concentrationCash & Liquidity Management | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Multi-currency, multi-entity cash reportingCash & Liquidity Management | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Automated bank reconciliationCash & Liquidity Management | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Scenario modelling & what-if analysisCash Forecasting | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Direct and indirect forecasting methodsCash Forecasting | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Centralised payment processing hubPayments & Bank Connectivity | Core strength | Partial Payment initiation is scoped to AR/collections workflows, not a full payment factory |
| Multi-bank payment formats & routingPayments & Bank Connectivity | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Host-to-host and API bank connectivityPayments & Bank Connectivity | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Payment format transformation libraryPayments & Bank Connectivity | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Sanctions & compliance screeningFraud Prevention & Compliance | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Payment policy & limit enforcementFraud Prevention & Compliance | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Interest-rate risk managementRisk & Financial Instruments | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Derivatives & financial instrument managementRisk & Financial Instruments | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Mark-to-market valuation & reportingRisk & Financial Instruments | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Exposure aggregation & simulationRisk & Financial Instruments | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Debt and borrowings managementDebt, Investment & In-House Banking | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Investment portfolio managementDebt, Investment & In-House Banking | Supported | Not evidenced |
| In-house bankingDebt, Investment & In-House Banking | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Intercompany netting & settlementDebt, Investment & In-House Banking | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Intercompany loans (incl. POBO/COBO)Debt, Investment & In-House Banking | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Interest calculation & allocationDebt, Investment & In-House Banking | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Bank account registerBank Account Management | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Dynamic discounting & supply chain financeWorking Capital & Receivables | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Configurable dashboards & KPIsTreasury Accounting & Reporting | Not evidenced | Supported |
| Developer portal / open APIPlatform, AI & Integrations | Supported | Not evidenced |
| App marketplace / partner ecosystemPlatform, AI & Integrations | Supported | Not evidenced |
| AI-assisted analytics & insightsPlatform, AI & Integrations | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Rapid, low-IT onboardingPlatform, AI & Integrations | Not evidenced | Supported |
| Certified ERP connectorsPlatform, AI & Integrations | Core strength SAP, Oracle, NetSuite, Workday and Dynamics connectors | Supported |
Both grade identically on the other 20 capabilities — see each product's full profile: Kyriba, Tesorio.
Kyriba vs Tesorio — FAQs
Is Kyriba or Tesorio better for ERP integration?
Both state integrations with NetSuite, SAP, Workday, Oracle Fusion Cloud, Microsoft Dynamics 365. Tesorio additionally lists Sage Intacct. Always verify the connector against your ERP version with a reference customer.
Which is cheaper, Kyriba or Tesorio?
Neither publishes a list price — both quote. Ask each for the all-in first-year cost at your seat count, as one number, and compare those.
Get pricing for both
Tell us your ERP, seat count and must-haves and we'll come back with an independent view of what Kyriba and Tesorio should each cost you — and whether a third option belongs on your shortlist.