Adobe Acrobat Sign vs OneSpan Sign
eSignature head-to-head for ERP teams: evidenced capabilities, published pricing, and which ERPs each actually integrates with.
| Starting price | Subscription (per user/month for individual and team plans; custom pricing for enterprise) | Subscription, tiered (Professional and Enterprise plans); annual commitment |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud, On-premise |
| Company size | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Stated ERP integrations | SAP, Workday, Microsoft Dynamics 365 | Oracle Fusion Cloud, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Workday |
| Vendor | Adobe | OneSpan |
Our take
Where Adobe Acrobat Sign leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 8 of the 26 capabilities where they differ (led by no-account signing for recipients and rich field library).
- Stated SAP integration the alternative doesn't list.
Where OneSpan Sign leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 18 of the 26 capabilities where they differ (led by configurable recipient roles and in-person / kiosk signing).
- Stated Oracle Fusion Cloud integration the alternative doesn't list.
Where they differ
The 26 capabilities (of 54 in the eSignature taxonomy) where the evidence separates them, biggest gaps first. “Not evidenced” means our research found no public documentation of this capability — the vendor may still offer it. Confirm on a demo.
| Capability | ||
|---|---|---|
| Configurable recipient rolesSending & Routing Workflows | Not evidenced | Core strength Recipient permissions (sign, approve, delegate) and visibility controls |
| No-account signing for recipientsSigning Experience | Core strength Recipient signing from browser or mobile without an Adobe account | Not evidenced |
| In-person / kiosk signingSigning Experience | Not evidenced | Core strength In-person signing for call centers/branches; co-browsing; integrated video conferencing |
| Accessibility support (WCAG/ADA)Signing Experience | Not evidenced | Core strength WCAG 2.0 Level AA |
| Government ID verificationIdentity & Authentication | Not evidenced | Core strength Gov ID verification with facial comparison; active/passive liveness detection |
| Remote online notarization (RON)High-Volume Sending, Payments & Notarization | Not evidenced | Core strength OneSpan Notary for RON and IPEN |
| Admin console & user managementAdministration & Reporting | Not evidenced | Core strength Centralized administration; role-based signing rules/groups/permissions |
| Rich field libraryDocument Preparation & Templates | Supported Drag-and-drop signature, initial, date, and form fields | Not evidenced |
| Conditional / dynamic fieldsDocument Preparation & Templates | Not evidenced | Supported Conditional (If/Then) fields |
| Self-service web formsDocument Preparation & Templates | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Delegated / shared sending accessSending & Routing Workflows | Not evidenced | Supported |
| SSO / federated signer authenticationIdentity & Authentication | Not evidenced | Supported SAML-based SSO |
| Encryption in transit and at restSecurity, Compliance & Audit | Not evidenced | Supported Encryption at rest/transit with key management options |
| Self-serve / ready-to-sign linksHigh-Volume Sending, Payments & Notarization | Not evidenced | Supported Fast Track URLs and QR codes |
| Usage & transaction reportingAdministration & Reporting | Not evidenced | Supported Performance, velocity, and volume analytics dashboards |
| Delegated / role-based administrationAdministration & Reporting | Not evidenced | Supported |
| Multi-account / organization managementAdministration & Reporting | Not evidenced | Supported Centralized administration across accounts and sub-accounts |
| Webhooks / event notificationsIntegrations & Developer Platform | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Embedded signing / embedded requestingIntegrations & Developer Platform | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Client SDKsIntegrations & Developer Platform | Not evidenced | Supported |
| Serial, parallel & mixed routingSending & Routing Workflows | Core strength Sequential and parallel signer routing | Supported Serial and parallel signing with customizable order |
| Bulk sendSending & Routing Workflows | Core strength Mega Sign to many recipients, each a personalized copy | Supported Bulk send to multiple recipients from imported lists |
| SMS one-time-passcode authenticationIdentity & Authentication | Partial Phone-based authentication option; SMS-OTP specifics not detailed | Supported |
| Knowledge-based authentication (KBA)Identity & Authentication | Supported Knowledge-based authentication | Core strength Knowledge-based authentication (KBA) via Equifax |
| Public REST APIIntegrations & Developer Platform | Supported | Core strength Open REST API with .NET, Java, and APEX SDKs |
| Native CRM integrationsIntegrations & Developer Platform | Core strength Salesforce, ServiceNow | Supported Salesforce, Pega |
Both grade identically on the other 28 capabilities — see each product's full profile: Adobe Acrobat Sign, OneSpan Sign.
Adobe Acrobat Sign vs OneSpan Sign — FAQs
Is Adobe Acrobat Sign or OneSpan Sign better for ERP integration?
Both state integrations with Workday, Microsoft Dynamics 365. Adobe Acrobat Sign additionally lists SAP. OneSpan Sign additionally lists Oracle Fusion Cloud. Always verify the connector against your ERP version with a reference customer.
Which is cheaper, Adobe Acrobat Sign or OneSpan Sign?
Neither publishes a list price — both quote. Ask each for the all-in first-year cost at your seat count, as one number, and compare those.
Get pricing for both
Tell us your ERP, seat count and must-haves and we'll come back with an independent view of what Adobe Acrobat Sign and OneSpan Sign should each cost you — and whether a third option belongs on your shortlist.