AMTdirect vs Occupier
lease accounting head-to-head for ERP teams: evidenced capabilities, published pricing, and which ERPs each actually integrates with.
| Starting price | Quote-based | Per-lease, per-module subscription (quote-based) |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Company size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Stated ERP integrations | SAP, Oracle Fusion Cloud, Microsoft Dynamics 365, NetSuite | NetSuite |
| Vendor | MRI Software | Occupier |
Our take
Where AMTdirect leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 7 of the 13 capabilities where they differ (led by custom report builder and cam / operating expense reconciliation).
- Stated SAP, Oracle Fusion Cloud, Microsoft Dynamics 365 integration the alternative doesn't list.
Where Occupier leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 6 of the 13 capabilities where they differ (led by transaction / deal pipeline management and ai-powered lease abstraction).
Where they differ
The 13 capabilities (of 41 in the lease accounting taxonomy) where the evidence separates them, biggest gaps first. “Not evidenced” means our research found no public documentation of this capability — the vendor may still offer it. Confirm on a demo.
| Capability | ||
|---|---|---|
| Custom report builderReporting & Disclosures | Core strength 250+ configurable reports | Not evidenced |
| Transaction / deal pipeline managementReal Estate & Portfolio Management | Not evidenced | Core strength Deal pipeline tracking from LOI to closing |
| CAM / operating expense reconciliationReal Estate & Portfolio Management | Core strength Operating Expense Manager for CAM/opex reconciliation | Not evidenced |
| Parallel multi-standard reportingLease Accounting & Compliance | Supported Dual entity/multi-book reporting | Not evidenced |
| AI-powered lease abstractionLease Administration & Data | Not evidenced | Supported AI-assisted lease abstraction add-on module |
| Customizable fields & data modelLease Administration & Data | Not evidenced | Supported Custom fields and saved views |
| Equipment / non-real-estate lease supportLease Administration & Data | Not evidenced | Supported Equipment and non-real-estate lease management add-on module |
| Site selection & market planningReal Estate & Portfolio Management | Not evidenced | Supported Site selection and comparison tools |
| AP/AR transaction handlingPayments & Financial Operations | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Multi-book / multi-ledger accountingPlatform, Access & Security | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Open API for system connectivityPlatform, Access & Security | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Centralized lease document repositoryLease Administration & Data | Supported Centralized lease and property document repository | Core strength Centralized lease repository and abstraction |
| Multi-entity, multi-currency portfoliosLease Administration & Data | Partial Dual-entity/multi-book reporting; multi-currency not evidenced | Not evidenced |
Both grade identically on the other 28 capabilities — see each product's full profile: AMTdirect, Occupier.
AMTdirect vs Occupier — FAQs
Is AMTdirect or Occupier better for ERP integration?
Both state integrations with NetSuite. AMTdirect additionally lists SAP, Oracle Fusion Cloud, Microsoft Dynamics 365. Always verify the connector against your ERP version with a reference customer.
Which is cheaper, AMTdirect or Occupier?
Neither publishes a list price — both quote. Ask each for the all-in first-year cost at your seat count, as one number, and compare those.
Get pricing for both
Tell us your ERP, seat count and must-haves and we'll come back with an independent view of what AMTdirect and Occupier should each cost you — and whether a third option belongs on your shortlist.