Lattice vs PerformYard
performance & learning head-to-head for ERP teams: evidenced capabilities, published pricing, and which ERPs each actually integrates with.
| Starting price | From $4/user/mo (published) | Per-seat subscription, billed annually |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Company size | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Stated ERP integrations | Workday | Workday |
| Vendor | Lattice | PerformYard |
Our take
Where Lattice leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 18 of the 22 capabilities where they differ (led by calibration workflows and goal progress from connected work tools).
- Published pricing where the alternative quotes.
Where PerformYard leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 4 of the 22 capabilities where they differ (led by completion & compliance reporting and configurable review templates).
Where they differ
The 22 capabilities (of 55 in the performance & learning taxonomy) where the evidence separates them, biggest gaps first. “Not evidenced” means our research found no public documentation of this capability — the vendor may still offer it. Confirm on a demo.
| Capability | ||
|---|---|---|
| Calibration workflowsPerformance Reviews & Feedback | Core strength Conflict-of-interest avoidance for calibration groups | Not evidenced |
| Goal progress from connected work toolsGoals & OKRs | Core strength Jira and Salesforce data pulled into goal progress | Not evidenced |
| Goal analytics & trend reportingGoals & OKRs | Core strength | Not evidenced |
| Succession planning & readiness trackingSuccession & Talent Intelligence | Core strength Bench strength, readiness and attrition-risk fields | Not evidenced |
| Individual development plans (IDPs)Succession & Talent Intelligence | Core strength IDPs with short- and long-term goals (Grow) | Not evidenced |
| Compensation band building & sharingCompensation Management | Core strength | Not evidenced |
| Pay benchmarking against market dataCompensation Management | Core strength Powered by Mercer data | Not evidenced |
| Compensation review cycle managementCompensation Management | Core strength Org-wide compensation cycle management with budgets | Not evidenced |
| Pay equity & fairness analyticsCompensation Management | Core strength | Not evidenced |
| Performance-to-pay linkageCompensation Management | Core strength Pay-for-performance workflows linking ratings to merit | Not evidenced |
| Engagement benchmarkingEmployee Engagement & Surveys | Core strength Against Mercer industry, regional and company-size data | Not evidenced |
| Manager action-planning toolsEmployee Engagement & Surveys | Core strength Theme-grouped suggested actions | Not evidenced |
| Collaboration app integrationPlatform & Integrations | Core strength Slack feedback, updates and review notifications | Not evidenced |
| OKR creation and progress trackingGoals & OKRs | Core strength | Partial Flexible goal setting with categories; explicit OKR framework not documented |
| Completion & compliance reportingReporting & Analytics | Not evidenced | Supported Cycle completion and progress tracking |
| Single sign-onPlatform & Integrations | Supported Okta | Not evidenced |
| Configurable review templatesPerformance Reviews & Feedback | Supported | Core strength Custom review questions and on-form calculations |
| Goal check-insGoals & OKRs | Supported Mid-cycle goal adjustment; weekly updates | Core strength |
| Internal mobility matchingSuccession & Talent Intelligence | Partial Promotion workflows documented; skills-based internal mobility matching not evidenced | Not evidenced |
| AI sentiment analysis of open-textEmployee Engagement & Surveys | Core strength | Supported |
| AI-assisted manager coachingAI Content & Coaching | Supported AI-surfaced personalized development areas | Partial Tone refinement suggestions for review writing; not general manager-coaching content |
| Custom reporting dashboardsReporting & Analytics | Supported Visual progress trackers and dashboards | Core strength Employee data dashboard, engagement trend dashboard |
Both grade identically on the other 33 capabilities — see each product's full profile: Lattice, PerformYard.
Lattice vs PerformYard — FAQs
Is Lattice or PerformYard better for ERP integration?
Both state integrations with Workday. Always verify the connector against your ERP version with a reference customer.
Which is cheaper, Lattice or PerformYard?
Lattice publishes a starting rate ($4/user/mo); PerformYard prices by quote, so a like-for-like number requires asking both.
Get pricing for both
Tell us your ERP, seat count and must-haves and we'll come back with an independent view of what Lattice and PerformYard should each cost you — and whether a third option belongs on your shortlist.