Skip to content
E
ERPResearch
Alfresco logovsFileHold logo

Alfresco vs FileHold

document management head-to-head for ERP teams: evidenced capabilities, published pricing, and which ERPs each actually integrates with.

Alfresco logoAlfrescoFileHold logoFileHold
Starting priceSubscription / quote-based; free open-source Community Edition availablePay-per-user subscription, with optional/custom add-on features priced separately
DeploymentCloud, On-premise, HybridCloud, On-premise, Hybrid
Company sizeMid-market, EnterpriseSMB, Mid-market, Enterprise
Stated ERP integrationsSAPSAP, Oracle Fusion Cloud, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Sage X3, QuickBooks
VendorHyland (Alfresco)FileHold Systems

Our take

Where Alfresco leads

  • Stronger evidenced coverage on 10 of the 20 capabilities where they differ (led by ai/ml field and table data extraction and legal hold).

Where FileHold leads

  • Stronger evidenced coverage on 10 of the 20 capabilities where they differ (led by related document linking and scanning & batch capture).
  • Stated Oracle Fusion Cloud, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Sage X3, QuickBooks integration the alternative doesn't list.

Where they differ

The 20 capabilities (of 51 in the document management taxonomy) where the evidence separates them, biggest gaps first. “Not evidenced” means our research found no public documentation of this capability — the vendor may still offer it. Confirm on a demo.

CapabilityAlfresco logoAlfrescoFileHold logoFileHold
Related document linkingRepository & OrganizationNot evidencedCore strength
Scanning & batch captureCapture & IngestionNot evidencedSupported

WebCap plus ABBYY/Kofax/Kodak/SmartSoft capture connectors

AI/ML field and table data extractionCapture & IngestionSupported

Entity and PII extraction via Amazon Comprehend

Not evidenced
Legal holdRecords Management & ComplianceSupportedNot evidenced
Regulatory compliance frameworksRecords Management & ComplianceCore strength

ISO 15489, ISO 16175, MoReq and FOIA compliance

Partial

21 CFR Part 11 only; no broader framework list documented

Audit trails & activity loggingRecords Management & ComplianceNot evidencedSupported
Electronic signatureRecords Management & ComplianceNot evidencedSupported

Adobe Acrobat Sign and DocuSign

Encryption at rest & in transitSecurity & Access ControlSupported

AES-256 at rest, TLS 1.2 in transit

Not evidenced
Secure external sharingCollaboration & AccessNot evidencedSupported

FileHold Courier audited external review via secure email link

Desktop sync / mapped accessCollaboration & AccessNot evidencedSupported

Windows desktop client

Microsoft Teams integrationCollaboration & AccessNot evidencedSupported
Reporting & operational dashboardsPlatform, Reporting & IntegrationsNot evidencedSupported

Workflow status reporting

Centralized document repositoryRepository & OrganizationCore strengthSupported
Full-text & metadata searchRepository & OrganizationCore strengthSupported
Folder / cabinet hierarchyRepository & OrganizationSupported

Public, moderated and private libraries

Core strength

Hierarchical library of cabinets, drawers, folders

Retention schedules & automated dispositionRecords Management & ComplianceCore strengthSupported

Records lifecycle and retention management

Certified records managementRecords Management & ComplianceCore strength

DoD 5015.02 CH2/CH3 certified records management

Supported

Features supporting FDA 21 CFR Part 11 electronic records compliance

Mobile accessCollaboration & AccessPartial

Web-based access from any device; no dedicated mobile app documented

Supported

Mobile app and web client

Public REST APIPlatform, Reporting & IntegrationsCore strength

Open REST API and CMIS (OASIS) interoperability standard

Supported

Web Services API

On-premise / hybrid / cloud deployment optionsPlatform, Reporting & IntegrationsCore strength

On-prem, private cloud, Kubernetes, plus open-source Community and Enterprise editions

Supported

On-premise or cloud

Both grade identically on the other 31 capabilities — see each product's full profile: Alfresco, FileHold.

Alfresco vs FileHold — FAQs

Is Alfresco or FileHold better for ERP integration?

Both state integrations with SAP. FileHold additionally lists Oracle Fusion Cloud, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Sage X3, QuickBooks. Always verify the connector against your ERP version with a reference customer.

Which is cheaper, Alfresco or FileHold?

Neither publishes a list price — both quote. Ask each for the all-in first-year cost at your seat count, as one number, and compare those.

Get pricing for both

Tell us your ERP, seat count and must-haves and we'll come back with an independent view of what Alfresco and FileHold should each cost you — and whether a third option belongs on your shortlist.

By submitting, you agree that ERP Research may share your details with matched ERP implementation partners, who may contact you about your enquiry. Privacy policy

Join 2,000+ companies using ERP Research to find their ideal ERP

Related comparisons