Alfresco vs FileHold
document management head-to-head for ERP teams: evidenced capabilities, published pricing, and which ERPs each actually integrates with.
| Starting price | Subscription / quote-based; free open-source Community Edition available | Pay-per-user subscription, with optional/custom add-on features priced separately |
| Deployment | Cloud, On-premise, Hybrid | Cloud, On-premise, Hybrid |
| Company size | Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Stated ERP integrations | SAP | SAP, Oracle Fusion Cloud, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Sage X3, QuickBooks |
| Vendor | Hyland (Alfresco) | FileHold Systems |
Our take
Where Alfresco leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 10 of the 20 capabilities where they differ (led by ai/ml field and table data extraction and legal hold).
Where FileHold leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 10 of the 20 capabilities where they differ (led by related document linking and scanning & batch capture).
- Stated Oracle Fusion Cloud, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Sage X3, QuickBooks integration the alternative doesn't list.
Where they differ
The 20 capabilities (of 51 in the document management taxonomy) where the evidence separates them, biggest gaps first. “Not evidenced” means our research found no public documentation of this capability — the vendor may still offer it. Confirm on a demo.
| Capability | ||
|---|---|---|
| Related document linkingRepository & Organization | Not evidenced | Core strength |
| Scanning & batch captureCapture & Ingestion | Not evidenced | Supported WebCap plus ABBYY/Kofax/Kodak/SmartSoft capture connectors |
| AI/ML field and table data extractionCapture & Ingestion | Supported Entity and PII extraction via Amazon Comprehend | Not evidenced |
| Legal holdRecords Management & Compliance | Supported | Not evidenced |
| Regulatory compliance frameworksRecords Management & Compliance | Core strength ISO 15489, ISO 16175, MoReq and FOIA compliance | Partial 21 CFR Part 11 only; no broader framework list documented |
| Audit trails & activity loggingRecords Management & Compliance | Not evidenced | Supported |
| Electronic signatureRecords Management & Compliance | Not evidenced | Supported Adobe Acrobat Sign and DocuSign |
| Encryption at rest & in transitSecurity & Access Control | Supported AES-256 at rest, TLS 1.2 in transit | Not evidenced |
| Secure external sharingCollaboration & Access | Not evidenced | Supported FileHold Courier audited external review via secure email link |
| Desktop sync / mapped accessCollaboration & Access | Not evidenced | Supported Windows desktop client |
| Microsoft Teams integrationCollaboration & Access | Not evidenced | Supported |
| Reporting & operational dashboardsPlatform, Reporting & Integrations | Not evidenced | Supported Workflow status reporting |
| Centralized document repositoryRepository & Organization | Core strength | Supported |
| Full-text & metadata searchRepository & Organization | Core strength | Supported |
| Folder / cabinet hierarchyRepository & Organization | Supported Public, moderated and private libraries | Core strength Hierarchical library of cabinets, drawers, folders |
| Retention schedules & automated dispositionRecords Management & Compliance | Core strength | Supported Records lifecycle and retention management |
| Certified records managementRecords Management & Compliance | Core strength DoD 5015.02 CH2/CH3 certified records management | Supported Features supporting FDA 21 CFR Part 11 electronic records compliance |
| Mobile accessCollaboration & Access | Partial Web-based access from any device; no dedicated mobile app documented | Supported Mobile app and web client |
| Public REST APIPlatform, Reporting & Integrations | Core strength Open REST API and CMIS (OASIS) interoperability standard | Supported Web Services API |
| On-premise / hybrid / cloud deployment optionsPlatform, Reporting & Integrations | Core strength On-prem, private cloud, Kubernetes, plus open-source Community and Enterprise editions | Supported On-premise or cloud |
Both grade identically on the other 31 capabilities — see each product's full profile: Alfresco, FileHold.
Alfresco vs FileHold — FAQs
Is Alfresco or FileHold better for ERP integration?
Both state integrations with SAP. FileHold additionally lists Oracle Fusion Cloud, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Sage X3, QuickBooks. Always verify the connector against your ERP version with a reference customer.
Which is cheaper, Alfresco or FileHold?
Neither publishes a list price — both quote. Ask each for the all-in first-year cost at your seat count, as one number, and compare those.
Get pricing for both
Tell us your ERP, seat count and must-haves and we'll come back with an independent view of what Alfresco and FileHold should each cost you — and whether a third option belongs on your shortlist.