FileHold vs Revver (eFileCabinet)
document management head-to-head for ERP teams: evidenced capabilities, published pricing, and which ERPs each actually integrates with.
| Starting price | Pay-per-user subscription, with optional/custom add-on features priced separately | Subscription / quote-based (contact sales) |
| Deployment | Cloud, On-premise, Hybrid | Cloud |
| Company size | SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise | SMB, Mid-market |
| Stated ERP integrations | SAP, Oracle Fusion Cloud, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Sage X3, QuickBooks | NetSuite, SAP, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Workday |
| Vendor | FileHold Systems | Revver |
Our take
Where FileHold leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 9 of the 20 capabilities where they differ (led by related document linking and check-in / check-out locking).
- Stated Oracle Fusion Cloud, Sage X3, QuickBooks integration the alternative doesn't list.
Where Revver (eFileCabinet) leads
- Stronger evidenced coverage on 11 of the 20 capabilities where they differ (led by ai-driven document classification and ai/ml field and table data extraction).
- Stated NetSuite, Workday integration the alternative doesn't list.
Where they differ
The 20 capabilities (of 51 in the document management taxonomy) where the evidence separates them, biggest gaps first. “Not evidenced” means our research found no public documentation of this capability — the vendor may still offer it. Confirm on a demo.
| Capability | ||
|---|---|---|
| AI-driven document classificationCapture & Ingestion | Not evidenced | Core strength Smart Extract AI identifies and classifies documents on upload |
| AI/ML field and table data extractionCapture & Ingestion | Not evidenced | Core strength Smart Extract AI extracts key data on upload |
| Related document linkingRepository & Organization | Core strength | Not evidenced |
| Email importCapture & Ingestion | Not evidenced | Supported |
| Handwriting recognitionCapture & Ingestion | Not evidenced | Supported Handwritten form recognition |
| Check-in / check-out lockingRepository & Organization | Core strength | Partial Locked-version capability; no explicit check-out workflow documented |
| Electronic formsWorkflow & Process Automation | Not evidenced | Supported GUI-based workflow forms and file-request workflows |
| Exception handling & escalationWorkflow & Process Automation | Not evidenced | Supported Conditional/profile-based routing, e.g. by invoice value |
| Certified records managementRecords Management & Compliance | Supported Features supporting FDA 21 CFR Part 11 electronic records compliance | Not evidenced |
| Real-time co-authoringCollaboration & Access | Not evidenced | Supported Real-time editing / Microsoft 365 integration |
| Mobile accessCollaboration & Access | Supported Mobile app and web client | Not evidenced |
| Microsoft Teams integrationCollaboration & Access | Supported | Not evidenced |
| AI document summarization & Q&AAI & Content Intelligence | Not evidenced | Supported Smart Summaries |
| On-premise / hybrid / cloud deployment optionsPlatform, Reporting & Integrations | Supported On-premise or cloud | Not evidenced |
| Version control & revision historyRepository & Organization | Core strength | Supported File versioning with locked-version capability |
| Folder / cabinet hierarchyRepository & Organization | Core strength Hierarchical library of cabinets, drawers, folders | Supported |
| AP invoice automationWorkflow & Process Automation | Not evidenced | Partial Conditional routing by invoice value; no PO/receipt matching documented |
| Regulatory compliance frameworksRecords Management & Compliance | Partial 21 CFR Part 11 only; no broader framework list documented | Not evidenced |
| Electronic signatureRecords Management & Compliance | Supported Adobe Acrobat Sign and DocuSign | Core strength Native e-signature |
| Single sign-on / identity federationSecurity & Access Control | Partial Optional Active Directory integration; no SAML SSO documented | Supported SAML 2.0 SSO |
Both grade identically on the other 31 capabilities — see each product's full profile: FileHold, Revver (eFileCabinet).
FileHold vs Revver (eFileCabinet) — FAQs
Is FileHold or Revver (eFileCabinet) better for ERP integration?
Both state integrations with SAP, Microsoft Dynamics 365. FileHold additionally lists Oracle Fusion Cloud, Sage X3, QuickBooks. Revver (eFileCabinet) additionally lists NetSuite, Workday. Always verify the connector against your ERP version with a reference customer.
Which is cheaper, FileHold or Revver (eFileCabinet)?
Neither publishes a list price — both quote. Ask each for the all-in first-year cost at your seat count, as one number, and compare those.
Get pricing for both
Tell us your ERP, seat count and must-haves and we'll come back with an independent view of what FileHold and Revver (eFileCabinet) should each cost you — and whether a third option belongs on your shortlist.