Updated July 2026 · By the ERP Research Editorial Team · Independent and vendor-neutral — no vendor pays for placement or ranking.
4 AR & collections products in our registry work with QuickBooks, including Chaser, Invoiced, Kolleno. Customer invoicing, dunning, cash application and credit risk. The strongest signal when shortlisting is Intuit's app review for QuickBooks App Store listing — verify it on the QuickBooks App Store (apps.intuit.com) before you buy.
| Product | Best for | Pricing | Deployment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Small business / Mid-market | From £199/month (Compact plan) | Cloud | |
| Accounts receivable automation platform for invoicing, co… | From about $299/month | Cloud | |
| AI-powered accounts receivable and collections automation… | £650 per user/month (BusinessPay tier, billed monthly; £545/month billed annually) | Cloud | |
| AR automation platform that speeds up B2B cash collection… | Tiered by company ARR; quote-based for paid plans | Cloud |
Customer invoicing, dunning, cash application and credit risk. Running it alongside QuickBooks narrows the field: integration depth varies widely, and a product that excels on another ERP can be a weak fit here.
This page compares the 4 options our registry matches to QuickBooks, side by side and vendor-neutrally — no one pays for placement. Each links to a full profile with features, integrations, pricing and alternatives.
Sage
NetSuite+2NetSuiteSage Intacct
Dynamics 365QuickBooksNetSuiteXeroQuickBooksSage+2NetSuiteQuickBooksXeroSage IntacctCustomer stories from the vendors compared above, summarised from their published case studies.
Software/SaaS · Enterprise
Runs with Sage IntacctWithin 2 months reduced outstanding receivables by 11% and decreased DSO by 2 days, continues to drive down key metrics, shifted approach allowing focus on highest priorities and shrinking total A/R
Healthcare · SMB
Increased early credit card payments significantly, reduced requests for paper bills to less than 0.1% of patients, 80% of patients with balances under $50 paid via mobile, 200% increase in bills paid within 45 days
Education · SMB
Accounting staff performs core processes 20% faster, maintains collections effectiveness index of 97%, setup new customers automatically, processing credit card payments automatically, customers access online billing portal
Non-Profit · Enterprise
Runs with Sage Intacct50% decrease in 60+ day overdue accounts in first quarter sustained over time, saved 5-6 days of manual effort per month, efficient professional payment experience via branded online portal, customers can manage payment methods and payment plans
Marketing · Mid-Market
Doubled cash collections within first 2 months, improved payment velocity, customers decided to pay off entire balances due to transparency, enhanced reporting capabilities, better collaboration across teams, doubled staff productivity
Software/SaaS · SMB
Runs with Sage IntacctReduced time to collect from 50+ days to under 30 days (nearly 20 days saved), reduced manual effort allowing team to feel like they could breathe, professional consistent billing experience for customers
Summarised from each vendor's published customer stories. Figures are the vendor's own claims, not independently verified by ERP Research. See all 8 Invoiced case studies →
A vendor-neutral shortlisting guide to AR & collections: how the 4 systems we track compare on capability, what to check before you sign, and the questions that separate a good fit from an expensive one.
AR & Collections Buyer's Guide
4 systems compared · 2026
ERP Research
Vendors in this category publish too little pricing detail for us to quote a range. These are the questions that decide what you end up paying.
1 of the 4 vendors we track in this category publish no list price at all.
List the specific AR & collections outcomes you need — volumes, workflows, countries, systems in the loop — and rank them. Vendor demos are optimised to reframe your requirements around their strengths; a written list keeps the evaluation yours.
Every vendor here “integrates with QuickBooks” — the differences are in depth. Ask each to demo the integration against a realistic QuickBooks configuration: your entity structure, your fields, your transaction volumes, and what happens when a sync fails.
Look for Intuit's app review for QuickBooks App Store listing and a current listing on the QuickBooks App Store (apps.intuit.com). Certification doesn't guarantee fit, but it confirms the vendor keeps pace with QuickBooks releases — uncertified integrations are where upgrade breakage concentrates.
Ask for two reference customers on QuickBooks at your size and in your industry, and ask them what broke in the first year. Implementation quality varies more than product quality in the AR & collections category.
Compare subscription plus implementation plus internal effort — not headline price. AR & collections for QuickBooks pricing models differ (per user, per volume, per entity), so normalise every quote to your actual usage before comparing.
Our registry currently matches 4 products: Chaser, Invoiced, Kolleno, Upflow. Each profile documents how the QuickBooks connection works and what it syncs.
Patterns vary from native marketplace apps to API connectors and iPaaS platforms. The most reliable signal is Intuit's app review for QuickBooks App Store listing; check the QuickBooks App Store (apps.intuit.com) to verify a vendor's current listing and supported versions.
Start from the integration: confirm the vendor supports your QuickBooks edition and the records you need synced, then compare functional depth and pricing on the profiles here. Ask every vendor for reference customers running QuickBooks — not just any customer.
This comparison currently covers 4 options that work with QuickBooks, including Chaser, Invoiced, Kolleno. Each links to a detailed profile with features, integrations, pricing and alternatives, and the directory is updated as the market changes.
Most vendors here quote rather than publish. Tell us your QuickBooks version, seat count and must-haves and we'll come back with an independent view of what it should cost — and which options are worth quoting against each other.