E
ERPResearch

Epicor Kinetic vs IFS Applications

Side-by-side comparison of Epicor Kinetic and IFS Applications — features, pricing, modules, and deployment options.

Epicor Kinetic vs IFS Applications at a Glance

CriteriaEpicor KineticIFS Applications
Best ForDiscrete and mixed-mode manufacturersAsset-intensive industries needing ERP, EAM, and field service in one platform
Starting Price$80/user/mo$110/user/mo
Pricing Modelper-userper-user
Deploymentcloud, on-premise, hybridcloud, on-premise, hybrid
Company Size51-250, 251-1000, 1001-5000251-1000, 1001-5000, 5000+
Implementation5–10 months6–14 months
Typical Cost$100K–$500K$200K–$1M+

Module Comparison

ModuleEpicor KineticIFS Applications
Finance & Accounting★★ Moderate★★★ Strong
Manufacturing★★★ Strong★★★ Strong
Supply Chain★★★ Strong★★★ Strong
CRM★★ Moderate★★ Moderate
HR & Payroll★★ Moderate★★ Moderate
Project Management★★ Moderate★★★ Strong
Inventory Management★★★ Strong★★★ Strong
Procurement★★★ Strong★★★ Strong
Warehouse Management★★ Moderate★★ Moderate
Ecommerce Basic N/A
Business Intelligence★★ Moderate★★ Moderate
Quality Management★★★ Strong★★★ Strong
Field Service★★ Moderate★★★ Strong
Asset Management★★ Moderate★★★ Strong

Pros & Cons

Epicor Kinetic

Pros

  • +Deep manufacturing capabilities (MES, APS, quality)
  • +Strong shop floor control and production scheduling
  • +Good fit for make-to-order and engineer-to-order
  • +Modern Kinetic UI with browser-based access

Cons

  • -Financials not as strong as SAP or Oracle
  • -Ecommerce and retail modules are limited
  • -Customisations can be complex to upgrade
  • -Reporting relies heavily on SSRS — can feel dated

IFS Applications

Pros

  • +Best-in-class field service management (FSM)
  • +Integrated enterprise asset management (EAM)
  • +Excellent for project-based and engineer-to-order manufacturing
  • +Strong MRO (maintenance, repair, overhaul) capabilities

Cons

  • -No ecommerce module
  • -Smaller partner ecosystem than SAP/Oracle/Microsoft
  • -Less known in North America (strong in Europe)
  • -Reporting/BI relies on third-party tools

When to Choose Epicor Kinetic

  • You need an ERP best suited for discrete and mixed-mode manufacturers
  • Your company has 51-250 or 251-1000 or 1001-5000 employees
  • You operate in Manufacturing, Automotive, Aerospace & Defense
  • You prefer cloud / on-premise / hybrid deployment
  • Your budget aligns with $80/user/mo starting price

When to Choose IFS Applications

  • You need an ERP best suited for asset-intensive industries needing erp, eam, and field service in one platform
  • Your company has 251-1000 or 1001-5000 or 5000+ employees
  • You operate in Aerospace & Defense, Construction, Oil & Gas
  • You prefer cloud / on-premise / hybrid deployment
  • Your budget aligns with $110/user/mo starting price

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Epicor Kinetic better than IFS Applications?

It depends on your business needs. Epicor Kinetic is best for discrete and mixed-mode manufacturers, while IFS Applications is best for asset-intensive industries needing erp, eam, and field service in one platform. Epicor Kinetic starts at $80/user/mo and IFS Applications starts at $110/user/mo.

How does Epicor Kinetic pricing compare to IFS Applications?

Epicor Kinetic uses a per-user pricing model starting at $80/user/mo, while IFS Applications uses a per-user model starting at $110/user/mo. Epicor Kinetic typical total cost is $100K–$500K vs $200K–$1M+ for IFS Applications.

Which is better for manufacturing: Epicor Kinetic or IFS Applications?

Both vendors serve manufacturing companies. Epicor Kinetic is typically chosen by 51-250, 251-1000, 1001-5000 employee organizations, while IFS Applications targets 251-1000, 1001-5000, 5000+ employee companies. Consider your company size and specific module needs to decide.

Need a personalized recommendation?

Tell us about your business and we'll help you shortlist the best ERP systems for your needs.

Join 2,000+ companies using ERP Research to find their ideal ERP